Thousands of Canadians demanded an immediate withdrawal of Canadian troops from Afghanistan this weekend. After more than 40 casualties, there’s a growing sense in Canada that the operation in Kandahar is not a peace mission. “We fear that we have become involved in a war we cannot get out of.”
By Frank Kuin in Toronto
Standing on University Avenue in downtown Toronto, Linda Borau holds up a sign with the words “Canada out of Afghanistan”. The Canadian woman has joined hundreds of protesters for a demonstration against the Canada’s combat mission in Afghanistan’s Kandahar province.
Borau is shocked by the “change in language” around the operation, she says. Initially she thought that the Canadian forces were engaged in a peace mission in Afghanistan; this year it has become evident that Canada is fighting a war.
“We fear that we have become involved in a war we cannot get out of,” says Borau, who has joined the rally in rainy Toronto to demand an end to the Canadian military presence in Kandahar. Canadian troops will stay there until at least 2009. “There is a gap between what we have been told about what we are doing and what is actually going on. We are in a war zone, with many casualties.”
Across Canada on Saturday, thousands of people protested against Canada’s role in Afghanistan – the first such protests since Canada sent 2,300 troops to Kandahar late last year, to provide security as part of the NATO mandate. Over 40 Canadian soldiers have since died, mostly in suicide attacks by insurgents and in military operations against fighters of the former Taliban regime. Supporters of the Taliban are strongest in the southern provinces of Kandahar and Helmand, where British troops are stationed.
Canada has not lost that many soldiers in a military conflict since the Korean War in the 1950s.The country prefers to focus on peace missions and humanitarian interventions.
While the Canadian operation in Kandahar was hardly noticed when it began last year, it has since become a steady source of front page news. Almost every week, Canadians are killed. But the exact purpose of the operation is not obvious to everyone, and there is no clear sense of progress. As a result, there is growing unease over the mission among Canadians.
“What we’re seeing here today is a public expression of deep concern about this mission,” said Jack Layton, leader of the social-democratic NDP, shortly before the demonstration in Toronto. The NDP is the only party in Canada’s House of Commons demanding withdrawal of Canadian troops. “This is the wrong mission for Canada.”
“Canadians want our country to work on peace agreements and humanitarian aid,” Layton said. “This mission is ill-defined; it feeds violence and extremism rather than to reduce it. Canada is not becoming safer because of it, nor is it improving the lives of Afghans. It is time that we withdraw our troops from a combat mission inspired by George Bush.”
“Canadians want our country to work on peace agreements and humanitarian aid”
According to Layton, the operation in southern Afghanistan is “unbalanced”, a reference to a report published last week by the Senlis Council, an international think tank. It says that for every dollar in humanitarian aid in the region, $9 is spent on military costs. That is the wrong approach to win the confidence of the Afghan population, according to the group, especially since there is a famine among displaced persons in Kandahar.
By participating in the combat mission, “the Canadian government has joined the U.S. foreign policy,” says John Etches, a protester at the march in Toronto.
Recent opinion polls have uncovered doubts about the mission in Canada. Earlier this month, an extensive poll showed that 59 per cent of the Canadian population thinks that Canadian soldiers are dying for an unwinnable cause. On the other hand, a survey published this weekend showed that a slim majority of 55 per cent does support combat missions for the Canadian army, provided there is a credible rationale for them.
The change in attitudes about the war in Afghanistan is a political problem for the Conservative government of Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Harper, who is governing with a parliamentary minority, is a strong supporter of Canadian involvement in the international fight against terrorism, alongside the United States. He has pledged Canadian presence in Kandahar until 2009, possibly longer. Although Afghanistan was hardly an issue in the Canadian elections in January of this year, that will probably be different at the next elections, which are expected next year.
Harper is hoping for improvement in the situation through reinforcements in southern Afghanistan by other NATO countries. Canada, which for years has stayed on the sidelines when it came to combat missions, is now punching above its weight within the NATO operation, according to most observers.
Like the NATO leadership, the Canadian Minister of Defense, Gordon O’Connor, has suggested this month that other NATO countries who are based in the much quieter north and west of Afghanistan should send their troops to the south, where the need is greatest. Canada’s foreign minister, Peter MacKay, has also insisted on that – and he is planning to do so again at a NATO summit in Latvia next month.
David Bercuson, a military analyst at the University of Calgary and a supporter of the mission, believes that a more even distribution of the burden among NATO countries is crucial to keep Canada on board. “If NATO says: we’ll provide what you need, here’s a mobile brigade, or the American troops are allowed to deploy to the south, then we’re going to see the Taliban getting their butts kicked,” he says. “That would certainly be a boost for public support. But if NATO does not, then I think that public support in this country will melt away in the next year or so.”
This post is also available in: Dutch
- The North
- Atlantic provinces
- Prairie provinces
- British Columbia
- Canada in the world
- Canada & the Netherlands
- Canada & the US
- First Nations and Inuit
- Immigration and multiculturalism
- Arts and culture
- Canadian identity
- Environment and nature
- Climate change
- Stephen Harper
- Dutch in Canada
- Tar sands
- Armed Forces
- Natural Resources
- Ottawa attack
- Barack Obama
- Liberation of Holland
- Haida Gwaii
- Justin Trudeau
- Keystone XL
- War on Terror
- Vancouver 2010
- Canada - U.S. border
- Luka Rocco Magnotta
- Jean Charest
- Indian Residential Schools
- Amanda Todd
- Khadr Family
- Downtown Eastside
- Michael Ignatieff